1 31 32 33 34 35 483
User avatar
Ray J Johnson
29 Mar 2023 10:01 am
User avatar
   
635 posts
Xavier_Onassis » 28 Mar 2023, 3:59 pm » wrote: Trickle down is the better description. The words "supply side" serve only to baffle and confuse people.

Supply side economics suggests that the wrong kind of economics would be DEMAND side economics.
It is only better because you want to childishly characterize it that way. Supply side economics is the best name for it because it targets the supply of goods and services. I am not a fan of supply side economics because it still has targeted tax programs inside the failed progressive tax system. If you get rid of the current progressive tax system, you don't need supply side economics. You switch to a sales tax or a flat tax. Free up as much capital as possible and let the system work for its self. 

Supply side doesn't suggest that demand is bad. Supply side is an attempt to free up commerce in the current tax system. Bothe supply and demand side economics deal with the same tax system. I want to remove taxes from the system to allow the supply and demand to regulate themselves. This way you don't have to choose one system or the other. You don't want to do this because you are for a command and control economy. 
 
1 31 32 33 34 35 483
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum